Deindustrialisation and Indian Crafts
Dhaka muslin, weavers' collapse, Wootz steel, TISCO, Swadeshi movement, inequality in trade.
Deindustrialisation and Indian Crafts
Weavers, Iron Smelters & Deindustrialisation
What you'll learn
- How India was a major exporter of textiles before colonial rule.
- How British rule destroyed Indian weaving and iron-smelting industries.
- Weavers — who they were, where they worked, how their trade collapsed.
- Iron smelters — traditional iron-making and how it was undercut.
- Industrialisation in Britain and its impact on Indian industry.
Key concepts
India's textile glory before colonialism
- India was the world's leading textile exporter for centuries — muslin, calico, chintz, silk.
- Dhaka muslin: so fine it was called "woven air" (Wootz, Daccai); exported to Europe, Middle East.
- Calicut (Kerala) → "calico" cloth named after it.
- Surat, Masulipatnam, Hooghly: major textile export ports.
- Weavers organised in caste-based guilds; supplied cloth to merchants who exported it.
- European companies (East India Company) initially came to buy Indian textiles.
The collapse of Indian weaving
Phase 1 — Trade control (1750s–1800s)
- East India Company became political ruler after Battle of Plassey (1757).
- Company used political power to force weavers to sell only to them at low fixed prices.
- Dadni merchants (middlemen) replaced — weavers now worked directly under Company-appointed gomastas (supervisors).
- Weavers lost freedom to sell in open market; advances given meant they were always in debt.
Phase 2 — Machine competition (1820s–1860s)
- Industrial Revolution in Britain (1780s onwards) → Manchester mills produced cheap machine-made cloth.
- British Parliament passed laws removing import duties on British cloth entering India.
- Meanwhile, Indian cloth exported to Britain faced high tariffs (duties up to 70–80%).
- Result: Indian cloth could not compete in Britain; British cloth flooded India at low prices.
Phase 3 — Collapse
- Demand for fine Indian textiles collapsed — mass market now bought cheap British cloth.
- Weavers retrained or turned to agriculture; many became agricultural labourers.
- Dhaka's population fell from 150,000 (1800) to 30,000 (1840) as muslin trade died.
Indian iron and steel
Traditional iron-smelting
- India had centuries-old tradition of iron and steel making.
- Wootz steel (produced in south India) was famous across the world — superior to European iron.
- Iron smelters (called lohars) worked in small furnaces using local ore and charcoal.
Colonial impact
- British Forest Acts restricted access to wood/charcoal → fuel for furnaces became unavailable or expensive.
- Cheap British iron imports (produced by coke-fired blast furnaces) undercut Indian iron prices.
- Iron smelters lost their market → gave up craft.
Revival — Tata Iron and Steel
- Jamsetji Tata founded Tata Iron and Steel Company (TISCO) at Jamshedpur, 1907.
- Used modern blast furnace technology; employed Indian workers.
- During WWI, British-Indian government depended on TISCO for rails and steel.
- TISCO showed that Indians could industrialise — important symbol of national pride.
Cotton mills in India
- Not all Indian industry collapsed — some entrepreneurs built modern mills.
- Bombay (Mumbai): first cotton mill, 1854; by 1900s, dozens of mills producing yarn and cloth.
- Mill owners: Parsi businessmen (Dinshaw Petit, Jamsetji Tata), Marwari merchants.
- Mills competed with British imports on coarse cloth — couldn't yet match machine-fineness.
- Swadeshi Movement (1905): nationalists called for boycott of British cloth, use Indian-made; boosted mill demand.
Impact on artisans
| Craft | Impact |
|---|---|
| Weaving | Most severely hit; fine weaving nearly extinct; coarse weaving survived in handloom sector |
| Iron smelting | Collapsed almost entirely; replaced by British imported iron |
| Pottery | Partly survived locally |
| Brass/copper | Continued for religious/domestic use |
| Silk weaving | Survived in Varanasi, Mysore with royal patronage |
Why didn't Indian industries revive quickly?
- Capital: Indian merchants had capital but invested in trade, not factories.
- Technology: machine technology was British; patents and know-how not shared.
- Colonial policy: import duties protected British goods; no protection for Indian industry until after WWI.
- Labour: cheap labour available but skilled machine operators scarce.
Quick check
- What was Dhaka muslin? Why did its production collapse?
- How did British trade policies discriminate against Indian textiles?
- What was Wootz steel? How was it affected by British rule?
- Who founded TISCO? Why was it significant?
- What was the Swadeshi Movement and how did it help Indian mills?
Open the Practice tab for graded questions on Weavers & Deindustrialisation.
Key Takeaways (TL;DR)
- What you'll learn
- Key concepts
- Quick check
Master this topic with Drishti OS
Get unlimited mock tests, AI-powered mentorship, and complete video courses when you join.
Start Free Practice